Quote:
Originally posted by andyman
Quote:
Originally posted by Dezzy
Quote:
Originally posted by andyman
Playstation 3... The tech blows the others away, any real gamer knows that.. 
The true power is still yet to come from the PS3, while the Microsoft Box and Nintendo pee gimmich have already reached its peek..
|
Technically it is superior, but what I've seen from the graphics they are pretty much the same as an Xbox, what's the point of having all that power if you can't use it to it's full potential?
|
Dev teams have had longer on the xbox 360, many still not making the PS3 their main format, over time this will change as more dev teams unlocks the power of the console, but sony have been slow with the dev kits for programers..
In the long run many dev teams will have the PS3 as main console with its tech and blu-ray, by then Microsoft should have blu-ray built in their consoles or face a slow vile painfull death... It can join the Dreamcast!
The 360 is already dated but kept alive by lazy dev teams and of course the spending public!
Even though the PS3 costs more, it is value for money with the tech you get, and blu-ray player built in!!
|
The Dreamcast was critically successful but financially not so. It's been given legendary status due to it's games that were quickly ported to the orignal Xbox and PS2 when they came out. Technically it was vastly superior to the original Playstation and N64.
To me it sounds like it has more in common with the Ps3 then the Xbox. This generation is reminiscent of the last one, ps2 was vicorious due to it's low price and the fact that it had a head start. The Wii and Xbox are in similar positions to the Ps2 this time.
The Blur ray probably is value for money but until HD REALLY takes off and the price drops on Blu Ray discs then there's not much point to it as a dvd player. A console lives or dies by developers and unless there's a bigger boom in sales for PS3 then Xbox will always be the key platform in which multiplatform games are developed. It's more financially viable.