Quote:
Originally posted by Zee
Quote:
Originally posted by 30stone
Yes last years was stupid.
Darnell
Kat
Mo
Rex
at a push rachel all voted the same people.
Darnell made Kat cry 3 times in 2 days and the same day he made her cry she still didnt vote him..
Pathetic.
|
Exactly; they were all clearly aware that none of them were nominating each other after several weeks, and so kept voting for the same people. It was getting silly when Dale, Stuart, Sara and Lisa were up for eviction and the likes of Mo, Kat and Darnell were getting away relatively unscathed. Thing is with all of the housemates up for a double eviction; Jack_; the public vote is way more spread out. I like the idea though. One way I think they could counter it would be to take two housemates from different groups, give them two votes each and whoever they nominate would be up for eviction for a double. That way either one of the groups loses two people; or they lose one each; and then the following week, if one group had lost two people, they could give someone in that group the only nominations etc. I just hated last year towards the end, knowing that even though Nicole was definitely going to be out when against Lisa and Sara; one of them would be gone the following week.
|
I think I get what you mean, but really, Big Brother would be interfering with the housemates bonds then if you get what I mean. It's difficult, and unfortunately I don't think it'll ever be solved, I just hope that the likes of Rachel will never ever win again, she was so incredibly boring.
Would a vote to save on a week where everyone is up make any difference do you think?