Hi itronik
With respect you kind of missed my point, The reason why my perception of the events changed was purely down to the different editing of the argument. There were comments from Bea that were omitted the first time. Also Kenny was definitely louder the first time. So my point is which is correct version? Its interesting how different editing can completely change a situation and does this happen to the extent that we are in fact manipulated into certain attitudes on housemates?
In my opinion this does happens a lot. Aabouts I said in my initial post "It makes sense, it DOES make it more entertaining, creates more controversy and the ratings increase! Everyones happy, apart from maybe the house member who is painted the evil villain, tart or dumber than dumb"
My point is completely valid
and I'm interested in other peoples take on it