Quote:
Originally posted by AhmedFan2004
Quote:
Originally posted by OnlyFoolsVote
Everyone complains when great housemates leave, and say the show is dull, yet THEY voted out those great housemates. Science, Victor, Sree etc all left way before their time.
And what happens when someone like me comes along and offers an alternative (punishment votes instead of eviction votes)?
They reject it without any real developed arguments. Sheesh, BB could be so much better if the plebs would wake up and smell the coffee, and that goes for the BB producers too. What a bunch of thick ***** we have as both voters and a production team. No wonder BB never reaches its full potential, with plebs like you lot 
|
I don't think it works quite like that, although I agree MANY are hypocrities like this!
I think, when it comes to eviction night, it's geared towards haters to vote; unless you're a big enough fan of one of the two who are up, so you try and evict the other automatically.
But the current format is geared towards haters. The many who complain about BB declining and being dull, often don't even vote and just watch for the fun of it, or whatever.
I mean, I rarely vote, yet I love BB. The voters tend to be the hater type, certainly on eviction night.
Vote to Save would work better. More geared towards fans and HMs 'doing stuff' to be noticed/valued.
|
Whilst you seem to understand my points, the latter part of your post here is pretty much nonesensical. The most hated (ie interesting) housemates will still be up! lol, so choosing which one to save STILL leaves a gaping hole as far as entertainment is concerned! Voting to save is pretty much pointless.
And this is why NO public votes should be held in regards to evictions, and why punishment votes should be the standard for future BB's.