[ElProximo]

Everyone 'shocked' over the 'schocker nomination' and very few have discussed why it happened in the first place:
Marcus and Bea HOWEVER... as a punishment for Marcus and Siavash we will put all HMs up for eviction.
Arguably, this could be a punishment for Siavash who would not otherwise be nommed,
but,
was another 'save' for Marcus. Not only was it not a punishment it gave him another great possibility to survive!
No wonder Marcus was laughing at the expense of others.. why wouldn't he love it!?

If the 'punishment' was that Marcus and Siavash face the wrath of all the others not originally nominated then that was pretty weak.
Rodrigo telling off Marcus for 12 seconds?

No no.. I think we all got entirely carried away into 'who to save' that we have not solved this.
Where is the punishment yet?

Here is my guess about the yet to be delivered punishment for Marcus and Siavash:
Friday Night. Live.
The nominations can now be revealed and the nth member to be voted for eviction is... .. RODRIGO!!
[Pause]
However... ...There are two HMs who have informed Big Brother they no longer wish to participate or might rather leave the Big Brother house.
(and those actions are why Rodrigo is being evicted),
SO...
...Big Brother will now give either of those HMs the ability to exchange their HM Status for Rodrigos.
They have 2 Minutes to decide if they will replace Rodrigo and leave as they claimed they desired,
or,
Stay HMs and allow Rodrigo to be evicted?
2 Minutes Marcus and Siavash?????

Potential:
If Marcus takes his place it can actually turn into a surprising vindication for Marcus. People will see he was to blame and was who would be leaving anyways,
BUT,
will give him credit for actually 'walking the talk' and for once really living up to his 'knights honour' claims and doing the right thing.
or,
If Siavash volunteers it will also redeem him as the one who paid for his wrongdoing and made up his mind to simply leave if he said he wanted to.

There simply has to be something else because unless Marcus (or maybe Siavash) is evicted then we go back to a house where Marcus (who would have gone) has, effectively BENEFITED from rule breaking at the expense of someone else.
No.
That cannot be the 'punishment'.

What say you?
Where is Marcus and Siavashs upcoming punishment after all?