View Single Post
Old 23-08-2009, 09:37 AM #19
BB22 BB22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,978
BB22 BB22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,978
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by lucifer1968
Quote:
Originally posted by BB22
Quote:
Originally posted by lucifer1968
Quote:
Originally posted by BB22
Quote:
Originally posted by lucifer1968
Quote:
Originally posted by BB22
Quote:
Originally posted by lucifer1968
Quote:
Originally posted by BB22
I have already identified two ways. I still don't see what the problem is.
having sexual intercourse with women
provide sperm for insemination.

i said moral way
You think having sex and using insemination techniques is "immoral"?
for a gay male to use insemination techniques to fetch a child into the worldYES
What about a heterosexual couple using artificial insemination techniques if they cannot conceive normally?
that's the moral way
So the problem you have with it is the homosexuality, rather than the methods.
it's your ****** up way of thinking that's destroying society
Curious. Up until this point we have merely been discussing what it is you think. And up to this point I have made no explicit moral judgement on anything. I fail to see why you have suddenly become annoyed.

We have established through a kind of Socratic discourse that you have no moral objection to heterosexual couples using insemination techniques but that you do have a moral objection to homosexuals employing such techniques. It would seem to follow from that that the source of your objection is the homosexuality rather than the methods used. This is just elementary reasoning at present.
BB22 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote