Quote:
Originally posted by AhmedFan2004
If he really doesn't want a free ride and is wanting to go up, then why didn't he just ask everyone to nom him, like Marcus did in the past - And thus ensure a Marcus vs Siavash eviction.
He told Charlie that he didn't want this because it would be Marcus vs Siavash. But he didn't elaborate on what was so bad about that.
Going by Vicky's post about what Siavash CALCULATED IN HIS MIND, not nomming ensured a 3-way; inc David. So this scenario seems fine to him.
My only logical conclusion is that he's happy with a likely 3-way eviction, but not happy with a 2-way eviction. Thus LOOKING GOOD FOR NOT NOMINATING + 3-WAY EVICTION WITH DAVID = RESULT.
I know he admitted a risk of it being a 2-way eviction ANYWAY, but it seems like it was a risk he was willing to take.
Why else not ENSURE a 2-way eviction by asking others to nom him as per Marcus of the past 3 weeks, if he wants to go up so bad? 
|
heres why genius.. had siavash begged to be nominated as charlie suggested,siavash would be accused of game playing and would of been told to "****" as they can choose who ever they like,charlies reason for nominating marcus this week was because marcus had asked to be nominated before and has now had a change of heart,so had siavash asked,they would only use this as ammunition to target siavash even more so than before..
so while you see siavash as "Scared" the truth is,house mates have broken rules at their leisure,yet siavash is somehow wrong this week.. for some reason siavash not adhering to one rule is oh so immoral yet every other housemate is okay to do so? sophie didnt nominate last week and charlie didnt have much of an issue with it,marcus has done much the same in the past.. but yeah lets persecute siavash,that seems fair