 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North
Posts: 3,172
Favourites (more):
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North
Posts: 3,172
Favourites (more):
|
Another good question is:
Why did so many decide Lisa was the 'baddie' in yesterdays episode?
Are you SURE ABOUT THAT?
Are you sure, even if 'crabby', but are you sure she was not actually in the right?
Are you really sure Lisa was the 'nasty one' or was it really SIAVASH and Roddy for that matter who were being the nasty ones, the sneaks, the users, the vindictive ones,
and,
Are you really sure Lisa was 'bullying' and being 'condescending'?
Really?
Because I suggest that if you saw that in a written transcript and were not told who was who - you would have identified Charlie, Rodrigo and Siavash as bullying, manipulating, ganging up, making nasty comments and all but 'abusing' Lisa and David.
You don't think that because for some reason you decided if Lisa was 'crabby' then she was the 'aggressor' but I suggest you rethink that.
*'you' being too many who saw things in a peculiar anti-Lisa bias.
|