[rquote=2516021&tid=145338&author=merv]"Regardless of who's behind the interviews..it doesn't matter to me, I still think all the relevant issues are being avoided, and since BB was originally intended as a 'social experiment' (it was never intended to be a 'gameshow' in the crude sense, sick of hearing that)...I feel the worthless interviews make the show worthless. If they aren't going to address the Q of a bully, then don't keep the bully in there. "
"As I keep saying tonight - Davina takes the money - so deserves the criticism when it is justified.
"
I agree with nost of these two comments.
What gets me at the end of this is the Belief Davina was responsible for good or bad questions, the interview times would desend into chaos if she was
All questions and possible answers would have bee tried and tested because of shedules.
I feel Davina does well when there are hiccuops, and recovers pretty well.
George Lamb is terrible at it, and answers for a guest before they have opened there mouth because of interview times restraints.
[/rquote]
If there's one thing I can't stand to see george lamb do, it's interact with other people.
