[rquote=2547518&tid=146901&author=ChrisCoutureUK]I think the complete opposite.
I like the twist, but I don't like the "evil" theme because we've had it the last 2 years. BB9 was specifically "Big Brother: Zero Tolerance" and BB10 was "Big Brother: Credit Crunch".
I want them to make it less like a prison. Housemates are more likely to be entertaining if they're not constantly punished and miserable. If you look at the difference in attitudes during BB9's split house - "Hell" housemates were miserable, moany and therefore boring! While "Heaven" housemates got drunk, played games, sang and danced together.
I believe housemates should work for the winning title and money, but at the same time I think there needs to be a lot less stricter rules and let them just enjoy themselves.[/rquote]
Fair point, and I do agree there.
In that case if they passed tasks then they would be given the complete opposite. A party would be thrown every night, with unlimited songs, lots of food and they would be given a lot more alcohol like the days of BB5 & 6, maybe even one night unlimited. Get something like a £500 - £1000 shopping budget and can buy lots of new luxuries.
Then do a twist with nominees every week. If the group have passed the two or more nominees get pampered all week with big leaving parties and hampers to get dressed up with, whereas if they fail their suitcases get taken off them and then must leave in what they are wearing at the time. But they could be given the option on Friday to half the following weeks shopping budget (if they pass) to get their eviction outfits back.