[Rob]

[rquote=2597866&tid=147718&author=MassiveTruck]The answer is simple and straight forward and involves no conspiracies against housemates whatsoever.

The reason there is a fanatical support for Freddie, Marcus and Siavash is because they were the most attention seeking, the most self involved and the most egotistical - i.e. they loved the cameras the most and wanted to be heard and seen.

The rest of the house were basically just well, sitting around chatting to each other and doing very little.

Now, back to paragraph two and the point relating to the thread. Since they were the most attention seeking and egotistical it was easy for the producers to create a storyline around them. They can create the show around them because they were the most desperate to have the air time. With Marcus it was the rebelling and the masturbating and the swearing and cursing. With Siavash it was the clothes, the lies and cheating, the game playing, the scheming - this list is far too endless. With Freddie it was his own arrogance in terms of intellect. His belief that because he observed things he needed the cameras on him all the time.

All three of these housemates have tried desperately to be in the public eye since leaving. Unlike other housemates, the vast majority that have returned back to normal life, these three are still trying in vain to publicise themselves over the net.

Anyway, since the producers made them the focus of the show since they were arrogant and egotistical - then people had either a fascination for them or hated them for their tedious, mundane, camera hogging exploits. It was a two way thing but their huge camera time due to their attention seeking brought them to the producers eyes.

Now the producers underlings obviously would have more questions for them, more to ask them as they were related to most of the controversy in the house.

The rest of the housemates? Well, they were only on air when they did something funny. Lisa hadn't done anything since week 2 when she had an argument with Marcus and then said, she didn't want anything to do with fighting and is keeping a low profile. There is an amplification of something she did almost 3 months before the end of the show. An amplification that is unlike anything in Big Brother history when in fact she barely had any airtime since that point and considering there is no live feed, nobody knows what she did apart from Freddie going around telling people she is doing this that and the other and since he had a lot of airtime, his supporters believed him.

So in summary, the reason why Lisa had a straight forward interview was simply down to the simple fact that there was little to talk to her about because the production didn't storyboard any of her exploits because there were none since week 1 or 2 of the show. In the producers eyes... (now remember, the producers have a life, they have kids, they have family, they have hobbies, interests, down time to chill out - they do not masturbate over Big Brother every day) the controversial housemates were Marcus, Freddie and Siavash... and why are they not?

Have we forgotten all the things that these guys did? Or are we just going to blindly say, oh they never did any of that?

In light of this and the arrogance and egotistical nature they had, some apologised for them, while others grew tired of three individuals with almost dull personalities hogging the screen - well the producers needed airtime and these are the three who, let it be known, when the producers pushed their buttons, they reacted and rebelled or masturbated or bitched and the producers got their footage.

The rest just got by with things naturally.

So this is why - the producers did not have a storyboard from which to ask Lisa questions. Only extreme fans saw this.[/rquote]

got to lol at that!