 |
Altar Ego
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Corcaigh, Éire.
Posts: 26,261
|
|
|
Altar Ego
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Corcaigh, Éire.
Posts: 26,261
|
[rquote=2616180&tid=148326&author=Harry.][rquote=2616169&tid=148326&author=ProbeEight][rquote=2616152&tid=148326&author=Harry.]No I havn't proven YOUR point. That was only part 1.
Think of a Lion, The males hunt and catch the food, Then the female gets (prepares) it later.
I can imagine other animals prepare food but that was a basic example.[/rquote]
Farmers don't hunt. They farm. Hence the term 'farmer' Sorry to break it to you.
When a lion catches meat and, as you put it, 'prepares' it, it catches the animal with it's teeth. Alive. And they tend not to season it, add chemical preservatives, and package it to sell in Safari Tesco.
Because they are wild. And we are not wild.[/rquote]
Because we have developed techniques to prepare food. We can still be eaten. Therefore we are wild. We can become battery chickens (humans) if was possible that another species evolved to become better then us. New word for you. Evolution.[/rquote]
Yes, but that has not happened. New word for you : reality. Your using other animals evolving to become smarter than us as a genuine argument? Have you any idea how long evolution of that magnitude would take? Billions of years. And would it suddenly make it right for us to be killed and eaten then if there was something smarter than us? You essentially just created another argument against yourself.
We can still be eaten, therefore we are wild? That's not an argument. Thats a fallacious statement. Your not in any severe risk of being eaten unless you venture outside of the CIVILIZED SOCIETY we have built to PROTECT OURSELVES from such things. Because we are smart. Because we are not wild and instinctual.
|