[Z]

I'm in two minds over it. On the one hand, I believe the bottom two should be judged on the sing off performances; other factors such as 'have they been in the bottom two before?' shouldn't come into it; the competition is meant to be a singing competition and you should be aiming to save the better singer every time.

On the other hand, what if Rachel was in the bottom two every week yet was being saved each time just because she nailed the bottom two performance? It would be just the same as the outcry against John and Edward going through each week despite being atrocious singers.