View Single Post
Old 13-12-2009, 05:08 PM #14
teabag. teabag. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,058
teabag. teabag. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy View Post
Joe's got a better voice and stage presence plus he's got a great recording voice and can hold a performance without gimmicks. The problem with Olly how he is now is that he's not a recording artist, his voice isn't distinctive or strong enough to hold the audience without the visual stuff. If they'd focus on his singing he'd have been more of a viable contender.
i think Olly has one of the most distinctive voices, it's not as strong as joes but i prefer it. He has that sound to his voice like when he sings superstition. So i think he would do better as a recording artist to be honest. Plus great in concert. He has it all.
teabag. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote