The "evidence" seemed so well presented. He seemed to dwell on the fact that there were no burn marks on the lawn of the Pentagon.
It all seemed so convincing and although we do not want to believe it, as Warrick says in CSI "You have to follow the evidence" And the way the evidence was presented ....
Will there ever be a point by point rebuttle from someone independant of the US government ?
As for who makes this stuff up, I would think it might be militia groups who believe the US government is out to get them. These people included the likes of Timoth McVeigh
