Quote:
Originally posted by ally001
Not very good at what, deciphering your ramblings? No I'm not!
The criticism has been justified.... in your opinion. Reality check for you... you are not the only one with an opinion. Everything you have just said is based on your assumption that your opinion is fact. I do not agree that she is indefensible so it invalidates your narrow minded reasoning that I am a star struck fan or I am Jodie, neither of which are true.
Some base their views on other peoples opinions too. You consistantly bleat on about paying attention to this series of bb, yet on another post you say no action was taken regarding pete's coat because it wasn't an endangered species. In fact it was read out in the diary room that there were two lists of endangered species and his was on list 'b'. I didn't want to point that out as I thought it was a bit sad to expect someone to have been paying such close attention, and you know what, you have proved my point.
|
Again, my supposed 'ramblings' that you have such a problem 'deciphering' seem to be eliciting quite significant responses from you. That suggests you're bending the truth ever so slightly, don't you think? Just to elucidate, I meant that you're not very good at constructing a viable argument. But hey, you knew that already, of course.
No, the criticism has been justified beyond any shadow of a doubt. Hence the fact that
Beatbullying have severed all connections with Marsh. Do at least try to keep up. The only assumption here is yours - that you'll be able to clamber out of the hole you've dug for yourself. What you may agree or disagree with invalidates nothing, as nothing that you've had to say so far has been valid.
It seems you've dug yourself still deeper once again. Perhaps you should have another look at the thread in question ...