View Single Post
Old 03-03-2003, 10:30 PM #13
steve_o steve_o is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Newton Abbot Devon
Posts: 1,709
steve_o steve_o is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Newton Abbot Devon
Posts: 1,709
Default

Your right if it was to drag on for years with ordinary people being called up I'd be against that. But we can only hope it wont get to that, and I'm sure it wont. the people of Iraq can't wait to see the back of him. They just want to live ordinary lives just like the rest of us do. Blair's worried because he doesn't want nasty weapons being sold to dodgy people, I know we've probably sold them most of them, but that was years ago and the worlds changed and lifes not fair. Blairs worried he knows that if something like that happens in America with civilians, being harmed by Chemicals or Germs or radiation the yanks will nuke anyone they can blame for it. They've used them before, and prob would again. It's best they get rid of the threat now and Sadams a threat, instead of just leaving it unchecked. I know it's unfair and people will die, but it could be a hell of a lot worse if he's just left and terriorists get hold of them, I mean Sadam and most of that part of the world seem to hate Americans and the Americans are paranoid about it. Which is only fair after what happended to the the twin towers. Sucide bombers are the worst people going you can't reason with them, and since that day all trust was gone, and it just makes them dangerous as well as the politicians there scared that's why these things get bad, but I'd rather have the policticans myself, even if they are a pain, there trying to do what's best for us at the end of the day. It's whats taken hundreds of years to build up and there not going to let extremists get in the way of that, I wouldn't neither.
steve_o is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote