Thread: Why?
View Single Post
Old 29-06-2010, 03:41 PM #16
SocietyIsRuined's Avatar
SocietyIsRuined SocietyIsRuined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,913

Favourites (more):
BBUSA17: John
CBB14: Gary
SocietyIsRuined SocietyIsRuined is offline
Senior Member
SocietyIsRuined's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,913

Favourites (more):
BBUSA17: John
CBB14: Gary
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WickerMan View Post
No, what should happen is this:

In order to make the boring ones contribute, they should be put in situations where they are favoured by BB and then the others can resent them. This will cause conflict. Or you could even reward the entertaining ones and give the boring ones a button to press. If they press it, the entertaining HM's get their rewards taken away but the boring one will get given a phone call from home or similar. Then footage of this is shown to the rest of the house, thus causing conflict. Variations of these techniques will make BB better.



No, arguments MAKE BB. Everything else is secondary.
But the other one is basically rich side/poor side from BB3 but done on an individual basis. Arguments are a lot of what makes BB tick but it's not everything. Sometimes the characters themselves are completely hideous or humorous and that's what makes the show tick.

If we had arguments every five minutes then we may as well build a big boxing ring instead of a house and let them fight to the death.
SocietyIsRuined is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote