 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,275
Favourites (more):
BBUSA20: Kaitlyn BBUSA19: Jessica
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,275
Favourites (more):
BBUSA20: Kaitlyn BBUSA19: Jessica
|
I'm starting to agree with the no evictions idea
Someone did a thread saying there should not be evictions through a series. I'm beginning to agree with this now. Maybe have evictions at the very end of the series but let the situation in the house play out with all HMs together.
This way the producers will not have to try to manipulate things to keep their favourites in, and HMs will not be so obsessed with groups and the gameplan. Instead you could see relationships develop over time instead of them just being short-term alliances. Part of the audience wouldn't control what the rest of us see either, there could continue being people in the house who satisfy all parts of the audience demographic.
There could still be twists to liven things up at times. Tasks would be more important so they would have to be better, longer and more challenging. That would be a good thing for the show too. It would be a more real reality TV show.
There would be less need to stick new HMs in later, which is indicative of the failure of the present system. They may start with slightly fewer HMs than the present format perhaps as well.
Last edited by starry; 06-07-2010 at 07:55 AM.
|