Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasown
Except it seems as if he may not have been guilty after all. Lots of iffy evidence used in his trail is being questioned using more modern forensic techniques.
Incidentally your inaccuracies are getting worse, like any good conspiracy nut, you throw some names and facts in to seemingly back up your case but on checking those facts they are wrong.
Saddam didnt destroy the infrastructure in the first Gulf war in Iraq, his troops had set explosives on the Kuwait oil wells shortly after they invaded, they blew them on retreat. Note Kuwaiti not Iraqi oil wells Gulf war 1
In Dance in the Desert 2 he started blowing wells in Iraq. Something the coalition had anticipated and had oil well fire specialist teams standing by as well as special forces teams inserted to stop them from blowing them.
|
You'll note I didn't say he burned them, he did destroy them, rendering them useless. The capacity was hugely reduced as a result of the first gulf war. (He did set wells on fire though).
I don't really see how that alters the fact that Britain is a corporatist state.
If alMaggy was inocent then he should have got off. He didn't. Nobody gets off cos they might be inocent, not without a court freeing them.