[Wildcat!]

Originally Posted by stewart64

Absolutely Rachel2 should not have gone, but she was unlucky to be in a strong eviction field.

The fact that BB chose four very nasty others is the main problem. I am not sure they could have foreseen Jo's woman scorned pyschotic change.

Hahaha!! 4 Nasty people!

This is exactly the point! The lala land kind of thinking. HOw youre so kick to brand them as nasty, if they do one thing wrong!
HOw were any of those nasty people?? Are you kidding me? Compared to some of the other housemates, they were far from nasty, and that includes all 4 of them, Govan, Ife, Racheal, and jo

That just emphasizes my point, if youre black, you better be the nicest (but if you are, you better not have an annoying voice), most perfect housemate with no bad qualities at all, or otherwise, you are the next target, and all of a sudden you are nasty! GIve me a break!

HOw did any of the things they do, make them nastier, than some of the ones they get evicted agAISNT?

The racism is there. Fair enough, if you dont want to talk about it, or you dont care, just leave it be! BUt for those who see it, and those who might consider that its there after reading this, then let them make their mind up, instead of dismissing the obvious!