View Single Post
Old 16-08-2010, 10:42 PM #107
BB_Eye's Avatar
BB_Eye BB_Eye is offline
Nothing in excess
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 7,496
BB_Eye BB_Eye is offline
Nothing in excess
BB_Eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 7,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calyman View Post
Any irrational or faith based beliefs qualify as being superstitious purely on the basis that there is no real scientific basis behind them. Therefore any practioner of any such beliefs are indeed charlatans, however well meaning they may try to convince the rest of us they are.
Of course you're going to look at it as a superstition if that's what you think. The natural sciences (to which I believe you are alluding) can't answer all of man's question. You forget philosophy is a science and in no way incompatible with the natural sciences.

Quote:
If proof is required, then it's the charlatan who must prove to all, that they deserve our credulity and acceptance of their claims. In the absence of such proof, they are just flim flam artists, promising nothing but Pie In The Sky When We Die.
Dave is a charlatan because he works for and enables an organisation that claims it can 'rehabilitate' homosexuals to lead intimate relationships with the opposite sex and that it can literally use supernatural powers to cure cancer. That is superstitious, irrational and anti-scientific and, more to the point, is a rotten, cynical lie.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off?
- Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis


Last edited by BB_Eye; 16-08-2010 at 10:44 PM.
BB_Eye is offline