[fallenkal]

Firstly I really don't agree with people being evicted after a week. When edited down each person doesn't even have 30 mins in which to make an impression. If it's a public controlled vote I think people need more time to make a decision.

Task controlled evictions always favor different people and I wouldn't want to see someone evicted over it. It wouldn't represent the people and would make evictions too chaotic.

Emails and calls over a proper interview is boring. Good TV personalities ask good questions, not voice their opinion the form of a question which callers are prone to on the eviction shows.

I'm a fan of putting people in a house and seeing what they do. Give them alcohol, and real parties and let them make bad decisions. BBUK is watered down when it comes to that. They don't want people getting too angry or too sad, too drunk or even sleep in. Hell, they give them a "shopping budget" on a TV show with a chalkboard and no calculator. Televising the mundane is Andrew personified. Lame. BBUK needs to loosen it's grip on the house guests because 15ish people in an enclosed environment with a prize at the end makes for entertainment by itself.

I like the idea of voting for the winner from day one though. Keeps people from trying to coast their way to the finale. The Corins, Andrews, Ifes, Nathans, Rachels and Steves would never stand a chance.

Just my 2c.