View Single Post
Old 13-09-2010, 06:27 PM #5
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Fair points by Dave, I guess. Before he mentioned his 'family problems' I was just going to say that he's bitter, and that whilst John James felt threatened, Dave didn't - and so there was no need for him to receive any outside contact. But seeing as they have lied to him, then I support Dave.

Quote:
Originally Posted by angus58 View Post
I agree, it must have really annoyed the producers having bent over backwards to lick JJ1's arse all those weeks, that it was Dave who finished in the final not their golden boy.
I very, very much doubt they were bothered, to be quite honest. As long as they got a Josie win they were happy to ensure that the final four days of the last ever 'proper' series were the dullest ever. If they'd have wanted John James in the final, why on earth would they have made the decision [arguably one of the worst ever in reality TV] to stage a Quadruple Eviction with a Vote to Evict? It was series suicide.
Jack_ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote