Quote:
Originally Posted by smartalec2718
I voted Alison. Everyone always throws Danielle a pity party for a bitter jury, but I think Alison got stiffed for the exact same reason. She played a better game, competition-wise and socially, from back to front. She stabbed the right people in the back at the right time and managed to make it to the F2 never having been nominated ONCE. Her only vote came from Nathan. Dana, Justin, Erika, and Robert (not so sure about Jack and Jee) were definitely bitter about things Alison did to them that were just good gameplay (Alison avoided getting evicted by Dana then evicted her the next week, she lied to Justin and got him to look bad in front of the house, she singlehandedly evicted Erika at F4 after winning the last veto, and singlehandedly evicted Robert at F3 after winning the last HOH).
|
Sorry but Alison's social game was horrendous, don't try to fool anyone. She's really the Russell Hantz of Big Brother, just without the self-entitlement and disrespect for the game. She'll get to the end all the time, but will never win a Jury vote. And you can't use the bitter Jury argument because every Jury is bitter, that's just the reality of life. Nobody's going to vote 100% unbiased, because everyone's biased, it's human nature. People just use the bitter Jury argument to make their favorite runner-ups look like they were robbed, when in reality they weren't.