Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
I've just told you what's similar about them. Maybe my memory is bad, but that's how I remember it.
A) If he's not dull why haven't we seen more of him over the series?
B) Could you really see him having a sell-out tour?
C) Could you really see him having chart success?
D) In what performance did he show us something 'different' [i.e the 'X Factor']?
E) If votes translate as not being dull, how come Rachel won BB9?
At the end of the day he is dull. Nice voice, but nothing different, special or interesting about him.
|
probably because all the focus has been on cher and katie? and all their patheticness.
can you see most of the others having a sell-out tour? no.
depends what your definition is, in his auditions and bootcamp, he was upbeat, didn't mess up his words, nice voice, good style. what more have the others had? ..oh right yeah just messing up their words and crying.
maybe because everyone got together to vote for her to win? which is why she won and most people watching big brother like nice people and vote out the bitches? x factor and big brother are completely different, you can't really compare them.
you just have a problem with people.