Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
What I mean though is it gives both acts a 'second chance' at surviving, rather than just being kicked out with the lowest votes. It's fairer in the sense that it's not all over for one of them, regardless of whoever that may be...
|
Its not fairer really though...to the person who is kicked out instead of actual least popular one
Say cher and mary were the bottom two. Cher actually got the least votes.
But the judges would save Cher, regardless of how bad her singoff was(and it would be bad no doubt, mary would wipe the floor with her).
if they based the decision SOLELY on the performance, then yeah, everyone deserves a second chance, but they don't. they use a variety of **** reasons.