Quote:
Originally Posted by MeMyselfandI
Katys music does not fit in for pop music lmfao..!!
nor is she popular
nor is anyone going to buy an album that sounds the same.
her voice is to weak (weaker than leon jacksons)
and she sings like 1980s stuff tbf.
she is the least viable imo
and she only had press because she 'took gamus place'
which is the real reason.
and you seem to think gamu was crap had no policity and was dull! Yet she was so popular and the nation did love her tbf hence the anger to katie
|
Katie's music? She has no music of her own yet, ROFL. To be quite honest I see her as another Diana Vickers [except without the support].
At the end of the day, you only hate her because she took Gamu's place. And for the record, no, that's not the only reason she's got press, and no, the large majority of the British public do not still care that Gamu didn't go through. They are over it. So it's time you got over it too. I never said Gamu was crap, infact I liked her, there were just better acts than her [the three Cheryl originally chose].
Oh, and 'policity' isn't a word - LMFAO
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeMyselfandI
its not trolling its my opinion..
|
and Treyc another alexandra.... GREAT! thats a platnum album
you probably thought leona was the same as treyc 'nothing different' well Jack 10 million albums. she was commercially viable. Hugely infact.. and so could treyc with the right songs[/QUOTE]
Yes...but the way you put it across is often trolling...
LOL no, Leona had outstanding vocal talent and it was evident she wasn't going to be massive during her time on X Factor.
I'm not saying TreyC wouldn't be successful [although she'd need a bit more support], but why would we want two winners that are exact carbon copies of each other? That's pretty dull in itself. Let's have something different for a change, eh?