oh fack off
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
|
oh fack off
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
Christ almighty, what is difficult to understand?
Cheryl refused to vote, so the producer in Dermot's ear would have explained that Cheryl has thus essentially lost her role as a Judge [temporarily] and as such there's now only three Judges, making it a majority vote. He then stated 'it's now a majority vote' - which is what I've just explained, and then Cheryl then stated 'but if you come back to me I'll take it to deadlock', by which time it was too late. And even if it wasn't too late, if you refuse to vote when you are asked, it's obviously a rule that you lose your vote.
I cannot fathom what is difficult to understand about this...
Last edited by Jack_; 07-11-2010 at 08:46 PM.
|