Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain.Remy
That's the whole idea of a bid: you spend millions on something you're not sure of getting at the end.
Then again, it was up to England's marketing team to make it right and put the finger right in the middle of the target. They missed the target and I must say, Russia's campaign was stronger.
England lost because of it's cockiness. They were 100% sure to get the project and BAM! they didn't. Too bad for them to be honest because I'd have loved it to be the host but come on now, this is ridiculous.
Yes the Fifa gave Russia the World Cup for its natural resources but also because Russia's bid was the strongest.
|
But.. it wasn't. England came top in every inspection & I believe Russia/Qatar both came rock bottom.
Russia OK, they need to fix alot alot of thing but it could be a good world cup but Qatar? Its a joke, just shows how corrupt Fifa is.
---
I think its so immature on the voters part that they blame the English media for why they promised they're votes to England (Another indication England did have the best bid) & then switched, they let their personal feelings get in the way of what was supposed to be a professional ballot. How can our media be a valid reason? What has that got to do with anything about the ability to host a world cup?
Alot promised their votes directly to Prince William/David Cameron etc so they either have absolutely no class or have been gotten to, I sadly believe its a mix of both.