Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex
That's not what you said at all. you can re-read what you said easily within this thread. Now you're just blatantly lying, you said nothing of the kind.
|
What part do you find difficult to cope with
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasown
It isnt anything to do with the Constitution of the US.
Its not a trial in the UK.
And he isnt currently facing any charges, he is wanted for questioning.
As accurate as always.
|
and
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasown
As I said it isnt a right based in the constitution, its a right passed down by tradition, it originates from English Common Law and has the same standing over there as it does over here. It was a Supreme Court ruling in the 1890's
|
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex
I have simply defended the US from many accusations in this thread, and let's remember, there is ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION to the USA AT ALL in the charges against Julian Assange The USA has absolutely NOTHING to do with his legal troubles.
|
You know that as fact? Is that just like you knew the contents of all the leaked documents? After all the US administration is so transparent and doesnt work behind the scenes eh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex
I seem to be the only one in this thread thinking about the rights of the WOMEN who have been abused by this man, this megolomaniac. This sociopathic man ho was unheard of 3 weeks ago, these charges were laid against him by 2 women, long before anyone in America, or the UK had ever even heard his name before.
Let these women have their day in court! you are so focused on the rights of Julian Assange, what about the rights of these women that have been assaulted??
Considering Europe continues to sheild the child rapist Roman Polanski, it's no surprise Europe continues to protect sex criminals in this way.
Misogynist Europe must CHANGE.
|
Of course no one had heard of him more than 3 weeks ago.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010...-investigation
Oooops kind of shot that one down.
However now he is all tied up within one country the US could ask for his extradition themselves couldnt they? Couldnt have worked out better for the US if they had planned this themselves.
Looks like the US will seek extradition as well however charging him could be unconstitional, the due process clause hasnt been tested throughout the US court system so he could fight the indictment from outside the US.
After all using US criminal charges against a non US citizen for something that didnt occur on US soil, where the accused had no intention of doing the crime on US soil etc, means the US is overstepping its bounds again.
Misogynist Europe? Do you understand where Sweden is? Or is it you are all upset because you feel this man has embarrassed the Good Ole US of A?