Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid*
I'm not entirely sure which 'man' your telling to get a grip!
you might want to actually read the facts, and not get all dazzled by the supposed sensationalism that you mention - or indeed, have a go at Angus for linking a DM report. In case the DM isn't to your taste, perhaps one from the BBC which I quoted earlier in this thread will help you.
|
Well seeing as i named angus in my post and also referred to the thread title as my bugbear i would of thought it obvious that i was indeed talking about angus maybe you need to re-read my post.
I wasnt actually aware that the original report was from the daily fail but does that suprise me? well i will leave that up to you to decide.
Short of social services providing a care worker to sit and observe a baby and its parents 24 hours a day what do you suggest?
They have to make a decision in the very limited time they have do you think you could get it right 100% of the time? you only hear about the tiny percentage of the time they get it wrong.(so in my book they must be doing a pretty great job)
If you have a better system that is completely 100% foolproof then please enlighten society with it because social services would love to know about it
I look forward to hearing all about it.
edit: please pyramid dont take that as personal criticism (as i really like your posts) but complaints should come with constructive alternatives otherwise they are just noise.