Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick
Depends how it's done.
I respect Endemol and trust them enough to not go TOO back to basic like in BB4 - I mean do we need to explain?
If they can reverse a few years back but also keep some elements of the present Big Brother [or at least what was Present].
- Keep the house the same, the BB9, BB6 and BB7 houses were the best because they were sexy and modern - don't go back to BB1's style of house for ****** sake!
- Make it an event! Like in BB7 when every eviction felt like the nation was speaking about it and this was brilliant, don't cut down on spending money on the stage and exterior presentation.
- Speaking of that, if you look at BB1 - BB5's titles compared to nowadays, it's obvious how far they have came. Don't go from amazing graphics to bland and dull.
Basically keep everything the same, just chose normal housemates.
By this I don't mean Josie Gibson, Andrew Edmonds, JJ Bird, Steve Gill, Vanessa McIntosh, Shell Jubin etc
I mean people like Michelle Bass, Dale Howard, John James Parton, Rex Newmark, Glyn Wise etc
The kind of people that we can relate to, who do entertain us in a normal way.
We don't want people like Angel McKenzie as much as I love her, the public want real people! |
The problem is Patrick you list housemates you relate to. We are all different and others will relate to the housemates you reject. All the above mentioned are normal in some peoples eyes.
Now I will tell you what an abnormal housemate is. One that dressess in abnormal manner for attention seeking.
Exagerated sexualties that draw deliberate attention to themselves......
In other words people who invent a personality for the purpose of the show...........Otherwise anyone else regardless to if you relate to them or not has to be deemed normal.......