Quote:
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Quote:
Originally posted by Deep2
Quote:
Originally posted by BB fernzy
Here's the woman who came out bottom of the intelligence test but you think she needs more intelligent/less boring people to stimulate her into being entertaining, what a load of baloney.She doesn't really want to get involved and would rather just sit and chat and even the chat's with people on her supposed level are boring as she's clearly lacking in conversation topics.
|
This post is a load of cack. The woman came bottom of an intelligence test.....I am amazed at how unbelievably thick people on this forum are.
1) What was the I.Q. test?
2) What is I.Q.?
3) What was the state of the person when taking it?
4) People are intelligent in deifferent ways: audio/visual/verbal/kinaesthetic
Yet you seem to believe that the test demonstrates Suzie is unintelligent, no questions asked.
As for the fact she does not want to get involved, read the original suggestions I and the OP made on this topic.
|
Just because you disagree with someone you have no right to call someone's post cack, you cannot have a debate it seems without trying to put someone else down.
My point is she has limited conversational topics.You can blame that on the other housemates but has she tried to start debates?
You spelt different wrong btw.
|
exactly, it's almost intimidating the way in which Deep replies to your view and post, which is why i'm led to believe he's imposing his views onto us