Quote:
Originally posted by Nowhere
Quote:
Originally posted by AdamArmand
Quote:
Originally posted by Nowhere
A debate is a casual discussion, Adam is claiming that anyone who doesn't think the way he does,is automaticlly unintelligant,which is unfair,narrow minded, and obviously ridiculous.. Intelligence is a knowledge of the world and all things in it, and if you can't understand that other people may not agree with you everytime, then you have a lot to learn, and not so knowledgable of the world as you'd like to think...
|
Not at all. What i am saying is that anyone who thinks Susie is boring without looking to the FACT that everyone else has failed to inspire her to 'come alive' IS OBVIOUSLY emotionally unintelligent. That is common sense. We are not all black or white my friend. Susie would be engrossing to watch if she was complemented by dynamic personalities. IMO, there are none. They are just kids who want to laugh and be the head of the 'clan'. Susie has amazing self confidance. Do you see her cracking up and crying in the diary room at any of the 'test results' like Aisleyne did?
|
It is only possible to judge someone on what you've witnessed already, anything else ould be a guess or estimation. You cannot say for sure she would be a more interesting character if she were put with different people,unless you've witnessed it.
|
You only have to look at the evidence - them chucking cake around, Mikey trying to intimidate people, Aisleyne becoming disillusioned, Pete going into his shell, Glyn's 'masturbation' woes... to come to the conclusion that Susie will not waste her energy trying to be one of the actors in these scenarios.
Where are the Pete Burns, the Jackie Stallones, the John McWhatsits, to give her something to LIVE for?!