Quote:
Originally Posted by Jords
Think of how many weeks altogether there have been of BB and count the nomination twist weeks, not many... And also most of them were just benefitting the 1 HM and changing how many they can nominate/immuning somebody...
Did you read my post? This isnt about doing that, its about changing what youre nominating...
Aims of the Weeks;
Week 3 - introduces nominating to save.
Week 4 - doesnt work on a who gets the most/least votes system like usual, but who works out on totalling 0 (bar 3+ -3 or less which is unlikey, but is purely to try and help the most hated HM by the others to remain in the house another week).
Week 5 - makes new HMs work to keep their position.
Week 6 - hopefully removes some deadwood.
Week 7 - nomination process linked with task, 1st time 1 person up for eviction in a should they stay or should they go situation.
Week 8 - pure twist, again to help keep disliked HMs in the house to stay - for arguments!
Week 9 - public get more of a say, which is what we like.
Week 10 - shows what the HMs intentions are, will they agree not to vote then backstab?
Week 11 - finish the series off by making it more nicey. 
Obvs these are just suggesting what they could do, people may have others which theyre welcome to say!  |
They've all been done, to a greater or lesser extent, before and
I don't like them ...... simples .....
