Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah
No, it wouldn't - as I pointed out, BB has frequently bent the nomination/discipline rules to keep "preferred" HMs, e.g. Cameron, Charley, Makosi, in the house ..... 
Playing with nominations serves only to confuse the issue, both for the viewers and the HMs, who, as we have seen recently, have taken it upon themselves NOT to nominate, thus incurring more nomination-fiddling from BB ..... 
As we know, alienated viewers abandoned BB by the million - IMO,too many HMs and too many "twists" (along with appalling simple "tasks") did not encourage viewer particpation .....  |
Totally agree with you here Omah, and thats annoyed me greatly, if they dont nominate they should either be automatically put up or booted the arse out!
However this isnt about 'fiddling' and its not about changing the nom selection for just 1 HM, they all get the same treatment its just the scenario in which they have to nominate differs.
You dont like the idea its cool but yeah, dont think ya getting what Im trying to put forward properly.
