http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-sto...5875-23121827/
Quote:
FOREIGN papers are now naming the celebrities who have taken out gagging orders in Britain – making a further mockery of the law.
Several published the name of the married Premier League *footballer who cheated on his wife in a six-month fling with Big Brother beauty Imogen Thomas.
A Spanish newspaper published a piece saying: “People in the UK bet on almost anything and this time they have bet on the name of the football player and dad unfaithful to his wife with the *ex-girlfriend of Jermain Defoe. (Player named) is the bookies’ favourite. They say there’s no smoke without fire.”
A Peruvian paper also had an article saying: “In the UK they’re casting doubt over the faithfulness of (player named).” Italian media also revealed his identity.
Several innocent people, including TV presenter Gabby Logan and celebrity *political activist Jemima Khan, have already being caught up in the fallout of the controversial orders after being wrongly identified on Twitter as having affairs.
|
Superinjuctions shot down in flames ..... private lives of "protected" celebrities exposed worldwide ......
Americans are bemused that famous people in the UK are able to stop the publication of details of their private lives, because it goes against one of their country's founding principles, free speech.
Quote:
The US has a booming industry in entertainment, gossip and celebrity publications, mainly based in New York and Los Angeles.
None of them need to worry much about injunctions.
The equivalent in the US would be something called prior restraint, but there are very few successful examples.
"The First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of speech and courts are very, very reluctant to prohibit somebody from saying something," says Steven Wagner, a litigation lawyer at Wagner Davis in New York.
|
