Quote:
Originally Posted by bananarama
Celebrities including footballers make their living by being presented to the public. Anyone with a career involving the public I believe have no right to privacy laws. They make their bed and should rest in it.
People accused of a crime however is far more difficult. Some have said for example paedo'es should have no right to privacy. I agree with the sentiment but in practice some accused of a crime are actually inoccent and yet they would suffer not only false accusation but also public persecution.
Also if for example a paedo was attcked the attacker would be commiting a crime by taking the law into their own hands A wrongly accused person may be seriously hurt or worse. So a privacy law involving criminal is in a way of protecting hot heads who want revenge that the law does not give.......
Even convicted criminals are sometimes not guilty. For that reason and that reason only serious criminal accusations should be subject to a privacy law....
Actors, actressess, sports folk and presenters should accept the consequences of their carreer if they beahave in a dishonourable manner......
The internet blows a hole in the concept of privacy so enforcing any law should their be one is probably impossible anyhow......
|
I agree with most of that ..... the "criminal" aspect is, of course, very tricky .....
