Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu
No, I didn't. You will notice of course that I didn't complain about that at all. Anywhere in my post.
What I was complaining about was the fact that our comments go completely unaddressed. The language of sentences like 'Whether you agree with the filter or not is irrelevant. It IS there, and it IS a rule.' make it very clear that it doesn't matter how ineffective, illogical and unsupported it is. It's there and we have to put up with it 'because it is there'.
It's just pissy, basterdized reasoning. I understand that you are just doing your job though and communicating what the administrative arm wants said. I think James is the only one that genuinly cares about the swear filter or sees it as integral in making the forum look respectable - even though I might be told it was a joint moderating decision.
Let's just say I disagree with him on his order of priorities on making the forum look respectable. Besides I have to maintain my pin up bad boy image.
|
K, I totally missed what you meant then
James has said again and again that the swear filter will be staying. Everytime its brought up he says that, so its not going to be changing anytime soon. Thats all I meant by the part you mentioned
