Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan.
I don't think there is anything wrong with an album full of current catchy dance tracks if you're new on the scene and you want to get peoples attention but when you've been releasing music for over a decade its seems sloppy and an easy route to take. She hasn't manage to out do herself in years. I don't know if shes either incapable to be back performing or if its plain laziness. Every artist should be at some degree topping their former music. Her fans may like it because its got her name on it but the album pretty much bombed.
She said she 'I wanted it to sound different from everything else out right now' pmsl who's she trying to kid? It sounds like any other autotuned dance tracks to me, nothing original about it. I've listened to a few songs from the album and I found the dull and forgetable.
Anyway I don't think this is going anywhere fast so im gonna just leave this as You like it & I don't?  |
The album is pure sex its awesome and you cannot judge untill you have listened to the whole thing.
And it hasnt really bombed it was top ten here and has been in the top 40 for a month now and was number 1 in America. If i released an album and it reached number 8 in the charts would you say i failed?
Her album "in the zone" in 2004 only reached 13 in the UK and this was when she was uspposed to be at her peek.
People think because her latest single didnt reach the top ten here aswell that its bombed but its been in the top 40 for 11 weeks!
Heres the albums chart positions from around the world.
USA- 1
AUSTRALIA- 1
CANADA- 1
FRANCE-4
GERMANY-10
IRELAND-4
JAPAN-9
NLD-7
UK-8
SWI-2