 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,565
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,565
|
freedom of speech?
Liverpool are investigating striker Nathan Eccleston for comments on Twitter that suggested the 11 September attacks were not the work of terrorists.
A tweet that has since been taken down said: "I ain't going to say attack don't let the media make u believe that was terrorist that did it. #OTIS."
OTIS reportedly stands for Only the Illuminati Succeed.
The 20-year-old has made nine first-team appearances for Liverpool.
Analysis
Continue reading the main story
Ben Dirs,
BBC Sport
An irony of Twitter is that while it affords sportspeople an element of control, allowing them to bypass irksome journalists who might twist their message, it also takes control away
Ben's blog on Twitter usage (published January 2011)
A club statement said: "The club takes this matter extremely seriously and senior club officials have informed Nathan Eccleston that we are undertaking an investigation into the circumstances surrounding these postings and will decide on an appropriate course of action."
Eccleston, who has over 39,000 followers on the social-networking site, has since tweeted: "If you don't like what I have to say un follow me!! Some things get took way out of context..."
why should someone be punished for expressing an off the cuff remark
people not allowed to express an opinion anymore?
fundamentalist muslims can burn poppies and call for the heads of soldiers and nothing is done
why this player being investigated and possibly punished?
|