 |
.
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nananana
Posts: 9,650
Favourites (more):
|
|
.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nananana
Posts: 9,650
Favourites (more):
|
Wut. You're looking at it all wrong.
I'd much rather vote to save a HM I like than vote to evict a HM I don't; like most people, I care more about my favourite housemates staying in the house. Which is why vote to save is better. And it means when there are 3+ up for eviction, dull housemates stand much less chance of staying.
In no way is it exploitative. It's something that should have been done a long time ago.
Last edited by Samuel.; 29-09-2011 at 06:51 PM.
|