View Single Post
Old 28-03-2002, 10:37 PM #1
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,274


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,274


Default Why BB3 was a total failure

From a History of the 21st Century, First published back in 2132. (Sent back by a freak rift in the space time continuum)

Quote:
The first two British Big Brothers had unexpected events which put a spin on them, and thus gained media and public attention.

The first one was characterised by an individual called Nicholas Bateman, known at the time as Nasty Nick who was found to be cheating. After he was ejected half way through it was said people lost interest. (Click on link for holographic recording).

The second British Big Brother was characterised by a romance between two of the contestants, a Helen Adams and a Paul Clarke. Interest continued to be expressed in this relationship after the second Big Brother finished .

When it came to the third series, it was doomed before it started, as it had been done before. A cheat would have been labled another Nasty Nick and a romance would have thrown up the Yawn factor of "Been there done that"

When it came to BB3 the trajedy was
Unfortnately the transmission terminated here


So after the Hype after BB1 & 2 how could BB3 top them


Of course the obvious reason for the faliure of BB3, was that none of us were in it.
Sticks is offline