Quote:
Originally Posted by BBfan6418
According to Pyramid when you post something on here you are talking to all FM's. So i guess you should have PM'd the person you were talking to. You should have corrected her because you two were having a discussion about it.
Of course it doesn't matter to you whether its fact or not. Just throw what you can out there and see what sticks. Don't get pissed when you get called out on it.
Not picking for the sake of it at all. My original question was, was it hearsay or did they quote Jay and Louise? You and pyramid decided to go off topic for a while before you answered the question. This whole thing could have been covered in a few simple posts.
untrustworthy - not worthy of trust or belief; "an untrustworthy person"
Aaron made a deal and shook on it. He has not paid up so he is untrustworthy. Simple as. Same for Alex.
|
Oh dear if you say so, I gave you the answer in the beginning STAR 28/11/2011, I also pointed out that I found the 21/11/2011 edition. How can any of us be sure that none of them have paid up? I constantly say we are only surmising. What more do you want? Shall I get the gallows out
If you look back I believe you will see that Pyramid put forward a post and I moreorless disagreed with his/her conclusion and I put forward my point. This is called debate.
My points are not jumped on they were basically just one post of fact and I certainly have not been caught out, that is such a childish statement imo. Pyramid hasnt jumped on my posts even though I put forward another view, the only person who has is your goodself. You must have your reasons and I work under the fact that everyone is entitled to their views I therefore give mine on this understanding. I like a good debate and not one of people just jumping and trying to prove points which none of us can at this stage, unless of course one wants to take it further with the magazine itself. To me it isnt important either way. There is nothing to prove so far as I am concerned so go in peace.