Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
Are you serious or just being pedantic again for the sake of raising an argument?
"after boy cancelled their cinema date" clearly indicates that this was the reason, summoned by the Daily Mail, that she killed herself. The article should merely report the suicide rather than make halfhearted suggestions as to her motives.
I know that if I read that and I was the boy involved I'd feel nothing but guilt, when he shouldn't do. Otherwise it's just an arbitrary piece of information about her day, it has no more validity or concern in the headline than "after eating slice of toast" would do
|
I'm being serious.
You said the article was disgustingly worded, shameful reporting et al.
When I asked why you thought it was:- from what you had said:-
Quote:
Another disgustingly worded article from the Daily Mail with absolutely no regard for the grief and thoughts of the boy or her family. Shameful.
|
You replied, not detailing what in the article that you found off, but insteadk you said it was the title.
I've explained very clearly why I don't think the title suggests anything of the sort that the lad is to blame:although you may disagree with me, my explanation is an alternative viewpoint - there really is no need for you to get all shirty because I don't agree with you or vice versa. There are other opinions on here Shaun apart from your own.