Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi
A local hunter is known for brutalizing an endangered species in an area known for having a corrupt government.
As an animal rights activist, you conclude that upwards of one hundred animals will die if the hunter is not stopped, putting the species at great risk of extinction.
So you decide the only thing to do is kill the hunter to help save the endangered species.
Is your decision justifiable in this circumstance?
|
Killing is extreme even for the hunter. Couldn't we just harm him enough to put an end to his activities
I am saying his, assuming the Hunter is male, but they could just as easily be female.