View Single Post
Old 27-05-2012, 10:27 PM #19
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Arrow

http://www.osirra.com/2009/11/should-of-vs-should-have/

Quote:
Should of vs. should have


Quote:
I have a couple of well-educated ex-colleagues who shall remain nameless who, in the written form, have started using the phrase should of, in the following context:

Quote:
Mum should of gone to Iceland.
I must stress that this is not the actual phrase they used. They used more business-like phrases. But you get the picture.

Speech has always influenced the development of written language. But the world we now live in is made up of people whose English education is often, at best, questionable—people who, even if educated appropriately to suspect a mistake, have neither the time nor the inclination to search for the truth. This means that mistakes like that above will become increasingly prevalent with time, which is a shame.

The correct construct is:

Quote:
Mum should have gone to Iceland.
Sign of the times ..... English speakers are poorly educated or just lazy .....

Last edited by Omah; 27-05-2012 at 10:29 PM.
Omah is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote