View Single Post
Old 23-06-2012, 03:09 PM #10
joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,334

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Danny Beard
BB2023: Jordan


joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,334

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Danny Beard
BB2023: Jordan


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall View Post
Okay this might be long and slightly convoluted, but I'm going to try my best to explain myself.

Firstly, the Christian God is the God that I believe in. Its a belief thats deeply entrenched in me. I don't consider myself Catholic really even though I was raised as one because of their attitude to not only homosexuality, but a whole host of other issues (which I won't get into because if I did I'll be here all week ). But I do consider myself a Christian. I don't think at an omni-benevolent entity would create a group of people for the express purpose of their discrimination. Its just not logical.

I mean if you take the passage of the Bible which labels homosexuality a sin, it has to be taken with a pinch of salt as that was written over 2000 years ago. Its simply not relavent to todays society. Back then maybe, what with the high amounts of disease killing people (reproduction was a necessity, and homosexuality infringed upon that I guess). But now thats no longer the case. The same part of the Bible from where that passage is lifted, also contains a verse which says that wearing wool and cotton blended clothing is also an abomination. It also says its okay to sell your daughter into slavery, stone her if she's adulterous (I think). The list goes on. I just think its absurd to actively defend the passage pertaining to homosexuality, when the other things I mentioned are also written in the same part of the book.

So I do consider my self a Christian, but with a slightly reformed (I think thats the right word?) view on the Bible and the religion in general. I don't take the Bible literally, so I don't thing that my interpretation of Christianity would see homosexuality is immoral or sinful. There are several newer denominations of the religion that believe that too. It makes sense not to take the Bible literally.
Niall,I have to say what brilliant post, it is one of the most thought provoking posts I have read in the 2+years I have been on here.

One of my thoughts as to organised religion is that particularly Christianity,so called because Christians claim to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Taking the New Testament which is presented as devoted to his life and teachings, also removing from the New Testament the rather volatile opinions of Paul,who one day tells us to love one another and another is ranting against all sorts of things, I am sure his writings depended on what mood he got up in a morning.What we then find is one simple fact.

In all of the Gospels which are supposedly attributed solely to the life, words and teachings of Jesus, he himself in all those Gospels speaks about many things both new and from the Old Testament too but nowhere,anywhere, does he mention or condemn homosexuality.Not a single word.
It always amazes me that something he himself seems to have not deemed to give any instruction on or condemn whatsoever should be a basis for so much controversy in Christianity by the hierarchy of Christianity too.

Your post Niall is excellent, really well laid out and said.

Last edited by joeysteele; 23-06-2012 at 03:16 PM.
joeysteele is offline