Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway
Your English Language skills have all the accuracy and readability of a 12-year-old.
And it absolutely would not increase euthanasia rates by such a significant amount as what you're implying: people go abroad to end their lives, which debases your 'argument' even further.
If the said person is in a fit enough mental state to make such a judgement, should they not be allowed to do what they wish? After all, is it not a free country - where people are free to do what they want?
You seem to labour under the delusion of free speech, which is meant to fool flocks of sheep who cannot think for themselves into believing that somehow they have control over the whole world at the tip of their finger.
Free speech is there to allow people to do and say what they want, not to be altered into what you think it should be.
Your argument so for has consisted of:
Anyway I'd stand a better chance going to the jungle and teaching a group of monkeys how to do logarithms than arguing with you.
|
Aside from the usual cheap shots and insults, the rest of your non-argument is embarassing, you wish to pass laws with no safety nets described that allows a free for all euthanasia bill? You have avoided all the complex issues surrounding this issue and chosen instead of hurl petty insult that belong in a kindergarten. I suggest you go away and construct a cohesive argument that somehow justifies the risk of killing off thousands of frail innocent vulnerable old people. Then when you have actually thtought it through properly , take out the insults, then post it to your local mp and see what response you get.
Clearly we disagree profoundly on this issue, I will however not stoop to your level of trading insults. Good luck with your letter, I suspect the issue will remain as it stands. But who knows if the majority feel like you do and the argument wins over the politicians , then who knows. I will continue to fight against it.